RCEW

CRITERION – 2

  • 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
    • 2.1.1 Enrolment Number Number of students admitted during the year
      • 2.1.1.1. – Number of sanctioned seats during the year
      • Any additional information
      • Institutional data in prescribed format
      • 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
    • 2.1.2 Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats)
      • Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories during the year
      • Any additional information
      • Number of seats filled against seats reserved (Data Template)
  • 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity
    • 2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
    • 2.2.2 Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
      • Any additional information
  • 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process
    • 2.3.1 – Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
      • Additional Information
    • 2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. Write description in maximum of 200 words
      • Additional Information
    • 2.3.3 – Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )
      • Additional Information
      • Upload Information
      • 2.3.3.1. Number of mentors
      • Upload, number of students enrolled and full time teachers on roll.
      • Circulars pertaining to assigning mentors to mentees
      • mentor/mentee ratio
  • 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
    • 2.4.1 Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year
      • Additional Information
      • Full time teachers and sanctioned posts for year (Data Template)
      • List of the faculty members authenticated by the Head of HEI
    • 2.4.2 Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year (consider only highest degree for count)
      • 2.4.2.1. – Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.C Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year
      • Any additional information
      • List of number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch./ D.N.B Super specialty / D.Sc. / D.Litt. and number of full time teachers for year(Data Template)
    • 2.4.3 – Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year)
      • 2.4.3.1: Total experience of full-time teachers
      • Any additional information
      • List of Teachers including their PAN, designation, dept. and experience details(Data Template)
  • 2.5.Evaluation Process and Reforms
    • 2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Write description within 200 words
    • 2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient
      • Additional Information
  • 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome
    • 2.6.1 Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.
      • Additional Information
      • Upload Information
    • 2.6.2 Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.
      • Additional Information
    • 2.6.3 Pass percentage of Students during the year
      • 2.6.3.1 Total number of final year students who passed the university examination during the year
      • Upload list of Programmes and number of students passed and appeared in the final year examination (Data Template)
      • Additional Information
  • 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
    • 2.7.1 – Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a weblink)